Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dikgobe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 07:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dikgobe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem notable and does not have much content. Rider ranger47 ^Talk 14:46, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found a few more book references, including one recording the term from the 19th Century, which I've added to the article. I added one more fact sentence. It is likely that more substance can be added. There are enough reliable sources to establish notability, in light of the reference I found to the dish's being an essential part of Setswana celebrations, even though the dish may be unknown in the Western world. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 22:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 06:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Aside from Geoff adding new references, "little content" is not a good reason for deletion (just tag it as a stub), and I'm not aware of any "notability" regulations for food. Even if there had not been references, you could have added a {{citation needed}} tag. --Biblioworm 14:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.